Analysis, book reviews and photography from Abkhazia and the wider Caucasus — updates when time permits

A first look at Abkhazia’s census results

Yesterday (December 28th), final results were published for the census held in February: Abkhazia’s population officially counts 240,705 people. Preliminary results made public on the 28th of March had put that number at 242,826 — the new figure was arrived at after excluding double counts.

This marks the first time since 1989 that official census data have been published in Abkhazia. Abkhazia’s Demography is a very contentious issue due to the small share of Abkhaz in the population and the massive exodus of Georgians during the 1992-1993 war. The large demographic changes since 1989 have led to widely diverging estimates and claims regarding the size and ethnic composition of Abkhazian society. At one point, Abkhazia’s government claimed that Abkhazia still had some 320,000 inhabitants, compared to 525,061 in 1989, whereas some Georgian sources claimed the number had fallen to 150,000. While Abkhazian sources claimed that a lot of Georgians were still living in or had returned to Abkhazia, this was disputed by Georgia. Conversely, Georgian sources claimed that Abkhazia actually counted less Abkhaz than Armenians.

The current census is actually not the first since 1989 — a previous one was held in 2003. Its results have never officially been published, and they have been claimed to be inaccurate. One criticism was levelled at the fact that the census was administered during the Old New Year holiday, when many people were at their friends’ homes. However, its results have become public and they have formed the best demographic estimate so far.

The 2003 census put the size of Abkhazia’s population at 215,972, which means it has since increased by some 25,000 people. As of now, only an ethnic break-down of the final census results has been made public, but the preliminary results indicate that while all districts saw their population grow, the total increase is overwhelmingly due to the fact that the population of the City of Sukhum grew by more than 20,000 people (from 43,716 in 2003).

The ethnic break-down in turn tells us that the population increase is entirely due to an increase in the number of ethnic Abkhaz (from 94,606 in 2003 to 122,069 now) who now form a tiny 50.71% majority. The Armenian (44,870/41,864), Russian (23,420/22,077) and Greek (1,486/1,380) populations actually decreased. As in 2003, only a small number of Kartvelians chose to identify themselves as Mingrelian (3,598/3,201) rather than Georgian (40,443/43,166). Curiously, despite the fact that during the last couple of years, some 8000 gastarbeiter from Central Asia have reportedly come to Abkhazia, these do not figure among the largest ethnicities.

The increase in the number of Abkhaz corresponds to an average annual growth of 3.2%. For comparison, Wikipedia, based on CIA World Fact Book estimates for 2010, gives natural population increases (the difference of birth and death rates) of -0.49% for Russia, 0.09% for Georgia, 0.43% for Armenia and 0.95% for Azerbaijan. It is safe to say then that the 3.2% annual growth of the number of Abkhaz cannot be entirely due to natural growth. Assuming the preceding calculations are correct, this leaves four logical options:

  1. Many non-Abkhaz re-classified themselves as Abkhaz between 2003 and 2011.
  2. The 2003 census was flawed and underestimated the number of Abkhaz.
  3. The 2011 census was flawed and overestimated the number of Abkhaz.
  4. The 3.2% growth rate is to a large part due to immigration rather than natural increase.

Out of these, the first two possibilities seem unlikely, but they can only be excluded if more detailed statistics are made public. Regarding the fourth option, it is certainly true that members of the Abkhaz diaspora in Russia and Turkey have re-migrated during the past couple of years. The destruction of the 1992-1993 War and subsequent isolation made Abkhazia a very unattractive place to live in during the nineties, which means a percentage of the population left for Russia that is relatively higher than in surrounding countries, allowing a relatively larger number of Abkhaz to return between 2003 and 2011. However, the average annual growth percentage of Abkhaz between 1989 (when there were 93,267 Abkhaz) and 2011 is 1.2%, which is still very high, especially considering the fact that a few thousand Abkhaz died in the 1992-1993 War. So if migration is to explain the strong Abkhaz population increase, it still requires a significant re-migration from the Turkish diaspora, which should show up in the full census results.

Given the fact that the current census gives a higher figure for Abkhazia’s population than many Georgian and international estimates, and given the high number of reported Abkhaz, accusations will probably be levelled that the census was falsified. However, it was organised in cooperation with the Russian State Statistics Service, which is a professional organisation, so it should receive the benefit of the doubt, and criticisms should specify what numbers were falsified where and how.

Conversely, the inhabitants of Abkhazia should be able to judge whether these census results are plausible. After all, the population of Sukhum seems to have witnessed between 2003 and 2011 an increase of more than 20,000 people, which amounts to almost 50%. Similarly, any large scale re-migration of Abkhaz to Abkhazia cannot have gone unnoticed.

Any comments and/or information from anyone who can shed more light on the subject are highly welcome.

Filed under: Abkhazia, , , ,

9 Responses

  1. Dogan says:

    “The large demographic changes since 1989 have led to widely diverging estimates and claims regarding the size and ethnic composition of Abkhazian society”
    So demografic changes from 1864-1989 do not count as large. What kind of inhumane mind would discount those sufferings abkhaz people have endured between those years?

    • sephiakarta says:

      Please read that sentence again and note that I am not `discounting’ any sufferings. There was no need to mention demographic changes before 1989 as the issue being discussed is the current demographic situation in Abkhazia, and 1989 was the year when the last census was held whose results everyone more or less agrees with. The origins of the demographic situation of Abkhazia in 1989 are a different topic.

  2. Dogan says:

    And also, i have 4 cousins who returned to motherland, working and living there. 20 000 is less than i would expect returning from Turkey. As soon as our ancestral lands are given back to us, many more will return. For that we must first evict occupying genociders.

  3. […] on 4 October, and the ethnic break-down has been added to the invaluable ethno-kavkaz.narod.ru. As I predicted in December (when full results were not yet known) the very high population growth since 2003 is for the most […]

  4. Since the latest ICG report – Abkhazia: The Long Road to Reconciliation, April 2013, page 3, footnote 12 – refers to this post (which I greatly appreciated when I read it first as it was published), I thought I’d share here some additional population related data that I gathered last year.

    I admit I couldn’t find an explanation for the almost 30.000 surge in the Abkhaz component of the population in 8 years, or even in 20 if we take the more reliable Soviet census as a reference, considering also the loss of human life that took place during the war and the reported low level of natality in the region. Any information that contributes in clarifying apparent inconsistencies in the data are of course very welcome.

    Anyway, here is some infromation I found.

    According to data published by the local statistical office, natural population growth in 2003 and 2004 was of +674 and +686 respectively (1.816 people were born in 2003, 1.919 in 2004; no data are publicly available for the following years).

    These data are generally coherent with school statistics: 2.044 pupils finished first class in May 2011.

    School data naturally include children of all nationalities.

    I considered the possibility of an inflow of ethnic Abkhaz from Russia, but this doesn’t seem to be the case. By all evidence, there was not a migration of this size from Russia, since the Abkhaz population in this country has been broadly stable: Russian census recorded 11.366 Abkhaz in 2002, 11.249 in 2011.

    • sephiakarta says:

      Thank you for these additional figures! They lend further support to my suspicion that the number of Abkhaz in the 2011 census has been artificially inflated.

      • Well, yes, I’d welcome any alternative explanation, but with the information I currently have the figures simply don’t add up. By the way, I also passed by the statical office in Sukhumi, and when I mentioned the fact that many had doubts about the data collected during the 2003 census, the lady in charge there told me with pride that the 2003 data were reliable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Recent tweets

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 677 other followers